Category Archives: Books

LITGA

Life is Too Grim Already — a group “working for a brighter genre” — now has a website. Currently it lists one book.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books

Cast in Courtlight, Michelle Sagara (2)

Cast in Courtlight was *really good*.

I missed a lot, I know, because I have not read the previous book, Cast in Shadow. I bought Courtlight without realizing it was the second in the series, and it took me a while to pick it up because of that, but it wasn't a problem. I had no idea what was going on with either Lord Nightshade or Severn, but that just added to the fun. (Though I'll probably reread it after I read the first one. Reading the summary of the first on Amazon just now already cleared up a few things.)

Sagara did a wonderful job with the setting and world in this book. Every few pages, I'd stop to mutter, “That's so cool!” There's a very realistic sense of history, and the descriptions are clear without bogging down. I wish I had more of an idea of the size of the fiefs compared to the size of the city; maybe the first book will help. The Barrani are a very strange, alien but understandable, species.

The only thing that bugged me in the book was Kaylin, the main character. I liked her, but she's one of those characters whom all the other characters love. She's always late, she's rude, she's willfully ignorant of anything that doesn't suit her interests — which seems like a poor survival skill — and yet everyone loves her.

The secondary characters are great, however, and the plot was adequately twisty, and there's a lot of humor — nice sarcastic humor — and did I mention all the random cool bits?

And lucky me, when I went to the bookstore to order Cast in Shadow yesterday, it was sitting on the shelf. After I get a bit farther in I'll post something about my personal taste in beginnings of novels.

1 Comment

Filed under Books

Weekly Summaries March 4

Misc:

lavenderbard has started a community for Life Is Too Grim Already, an organization (still being developed) that she came up with to promote the creation and distribution of “not grim” science fiction and fantasy, largely by making it easier for readers to find this kind of book.

I like grim quite a lot, but since it is sometimes nice to read something not-grim, I'll keep an eye on this. I went over my reading list from the past few years and came up with hardly any not-grim books.

frost-light on whether to tell someone that the book you're critting for them stinks: Honesty is golden when it comes to critiquing. Now, you don't have to be rude and say “this stinks” or “you're the worst writer ever!”, but an explanation of the how, what and why is important. Mentioning what you DID like also is important, because that shows the writer where their strengths are (at least in your opinion).

Absolutely right. If someone's serious about improving, it doesn't do any good to not tell them the problems you see. (Though figuring out whether they're serious or not can be tricky.) But rudeness doesn't actually help get your point across.

• Justine Larbalestier forwards a question about good day jobs for writers.

• Yesterday I discovered hockeyfights.com. Ratings, reviews, and videos. I am both amused and happy that I can see fights from games I don't watch.

Writing Summary:

Goals for the week fortnight (halfway through):
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15, Finish ch 1-3, Type ch 4-10, Notebook notes for ch 11-15.
Not the scenes-that-could-be-a-short mentioned above, darn it. Have successfully resisted.

Unexpected stuff that came up: Revising a short story, and some critting on the OWW.

This week I need do to more critting, which is only partly a blatant attempt to get more reviews. I also have a few reviews to return. And I continue to test the “learn how to write better by critting” thing that so many people have mentioned…

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books, Writing

Weekly Summaries Feb. 25

Writing Summary:
I took the week off from writing, mostly, and may take this week off as well. Needed a break, and needed time to do some other things.

Also, my brain thinks it should be in story-producing mode, rather than editing mode or writing mode. Story-producing mode means daydreaming. It seems incredibly non-productive (because I lie around in bed producing nothing tangible), and it steals creative energy from whatever I should be working on, but without it, there would be no stories to write in the future.

Though it'd be nice if my brain weren't stuck on a story that's so far down the to-write queue. Maybe I can make these scenes into a short story. They're more bits of the Joceln-and-Arthos book, and I'm already trying to sell the prologue as a short story. And it could be more emotion-practice….

Should do in the next two weeks:
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15
Finish ch 1-3
Type ch 4-10
Notebook notes for ch 11-15
Not the scenes-that-could-be-a-short mentioned above, darn it.

Monthly Checkup:
My February goals have morphed into March goals. But I made progress on the more important ones, and on various things that came up since I set them, so whatever. I seem to have two big problems with setting medium-term goals: changing my mind partway through, and a lack of motivation since I have no deadlines.

I try to think of them more as guidelines, and as long as I'm being productive on something, to not worry about it much. It'll all even out eventually.

Misc.:
So I'm reading this book that shall remain unnamed. And, argh. It's a sequel to a book that I liked a lot – enough that I picked up books 2 and 3 without any reservations. But oh, the angst! Why is it so much more annoying than in book 1? Possibly because it isn't new? Or is the author really beating me over the head with it that much more in this book? Or is the plot just not as interesting/fast-paced as in book 1, and so doesn't make up for all the whining? Or am I just over sensitive to emotional stuff because that's what I've been working on lately?

(Those would be rhetorcal questions, though you're welcome to answer them anyway.)

There are a lot of little bits that seem very repetitive. I feel like the author tells me everything twice. I was going to put it down at chapter 10, but kept going — there is just enough plot to drag me through the slowness, and the angst seems to be dropping off (after a bit with too little emotional payoff) — and then I hit a bizarre statement about wine transportation that made no sense, and important plot points ought to make more sense.

Sooo…..maybe I'll just move on to the next thing on the to-read shelf. You only get to annoy me so much before I put the book down “temporarily” and neglect to pick it up again. Even if I do want to know what happens, it may not be worth my time.

There are probably lessons here for me as a writer, but I suspect they're not ones I should be learning. I tend to err the other way — not including enough, rather than too much.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Books, Writing

The Weirdstone of Brisingamen, Alan Garner (1)

I don't know how I managed to miss Alan Garner's The Weirdstone of Brisingamen when I was a kid, because I would have loved it then even more than I did yesterday, which was a lot: gripping plot, and the girl character isn't a whiny wimp.

She was certainly a lot braver than I'd have been in those sixty pages of mines and tunnels; they'd have had to cut my throat and leave me there because I'd have refused to squeeze through that final section, assuming I'd made it that far. That part of the book might have been more frightening than the fighting at the end.

The one problem I had was that I kept distracting myself by drawing parallels to The Fellowship of the Ring (the Mines of Moria and Lothlorien, in particular), but that wasn't a huge issue.

I bought my copy in Boston, along with a bunch of other used books that have been living in boxes for years, unread. I always wondered why it has Darth Vader on the cover. (My version is shown in the bottom row on this page.) Reading the book only partially helped explain that (that's not how I pictured the character at all); I wonder if the edition's being printed in 1978 might be part of the answer.

Comments Off on The Weirdstone of Brisingamen, Alan Garner (1)

Filed under Books

Books Read, 2006

SF unless otherwise noted:

13: Lud-in-the-Mist, Hope Mirrlees
12: His Excellency, Joseph J. Ellis [history]
11: Devlin's Luck, Patricia Bray
10: Kitty and the Midnight Hour by Carrie Vaughn
9: Vellum, Hal Duncan
8: Tall, Dark, & Dead by Tate Hallaway
7: The Historian, Elizabeth Kostova
6: Tim Pratt's The Strange Adventures of Rangergirl
5: American Gods, Neil Gaiman
4: Threads of Malice, Tamara Siler Jones
3: Crystal Rain, Tobias Buckell
2: Make Lemonade, Virginia Euwer Wolff [mainstream YA]
1: A Feast for Crows, George R.R. Martin

And various other books that I didn't finish for one reason or another (mostly because I didn't like them) and many (but not the whole year's worth) issues of F&SF.

I need more variety in my genres. 2007 will definitely see more history, beginning with Ellis' Founding Brothers, and it'd be nice to throw in some other non-fiction, but *peeks at to-read shelf* I'm unlikely to read any more science fiction. With luck I'll have less urban fantasy.

While I was home last week, I sorted through the books in my closet at my parents' house, and brought back my entire set of Laura Ingalls Wilder. I haven't reread those in years.

Comments Off on Books Read, 2006

Filed under Books

Lud-in-the-Mist, Hope Mirrlees (13)

Hope Mirrlees' Lud-in-the-Mist, published in 1926, was well worth reading: unusual, thought-provoking, and beautifully written, including a wonderful literal description of a sunrise (at the end of chapter 20).

The book concerns the people of Dorimare (the title is the capital city) and their struggle with the effects of fruit smuggled from Fairyland, just to the west of Dorimare, which banned everything to do with Fairy centuries before. In particular, Nathaniel Chanticleer struggles to help his son, who has eaten Fairy Fruit, and to solve a very cold murder case.

I had a few problems with the book (including a major complaint towards the end) but on the whole it was delightful.

Comments Off on Lud-in-the-Mist, Hope Mirrlees (13)

Filed under Books

Survey: Why do people buy books?

David Louis Edelman surveyed people about why they bought the books they bought.

Top three reasons: They read other books by the author, a friend recommended it, and they judged the book by its cover. Those are generally my reasons as well, and the reasons I try to write up posts on books that I like.

Comments Off on Survey: Why do people buy books?

Filed under Books

Fantasy vs SF; Joy of Cooking

• [info]sartorias on kids preferring fantasy to sf (specifically the YA versions).

Her theory sounds pretty reasonable to me (though there’s a difference between science fiction that focuses on the science and sf that focuses on the story, and I definitely prefer the latter), and also explains why I like fantasy better (though I always liked sf too): science was fascinating, sure, but it was also mundane and normal, the sort of thing that people did for a career – a large proportion of the adults I knew as I kid worked in the space industry, so the idea of people going up in spaceships was not very far-fetched. Magic, on the other hand, was completely exotic.

• The NYTimes reviews the 75th-anniversary edition of the Joy of Cooking, which came out last week (article dated Nov. 1 and hopefully still available):

The bad news is that this new version forces a decision. Which “Joy” do we want? Do we keep our mother’s vintage copy from the ’60s? The reliable and popular version from 1975? The smart, chef-driven 1997 book? Or do we clean house, get with the times and buy the new book, which has much more reference material along with a cloying coat of nostalgia?

[…]

All that being said, the new version is the most complete and current “Joy” you can buy. If I didn’t have my trusty 1975 version, I would shell out $30. But for the number of times I actually dip into “Joy,” the ’75 will suffice. After all, a meringue is a meringue and cuts of beef don’t really change.

Still, cooking is a highly personal thing, and the book that fits best depends on your demographic, your kitchen skill and your existing cookbook collection. Those who want a book that reminds them of their mothers and includes the pecan-laden angel slices they remember from childhood might prefer a vintage edition from the 1950s, or the 1963 revision.

My brother, the best cook in the family and someone who prefers not to mix sentimentality with information, is the kind of cook who would appreciate the smarter tone, multicultural depth and thorough exploration of technique in the 1997 book.

My household is a three-Joy household: My parents gave me the 1997 version (which I use for all my basic recipes) and a two-volume paperback from 1964, which I should investigate more thoroughly. My boyfriend has the 1975 version, which has a better pancake recipe than the 1997. I have annotated my 1997 pancake recipe with the 1975 ingredients.

I was amused that the writer mentioned the tuna casserole recipes in each edition, since I made the 1997 version last weekend. It calls for making a butter/flour/milk/cheese sauce, while the 1975 and 2006 versions use cream of mushroom soup. I’ll stick with my 1997 book, thanks.

Comments Off on Fantasy vs SF; Joy of Cooking

Filed under Books, Food

His Excellency, Joseph J. Ellis (12)

Biography of George Washington. Part of my plan to learn American History and steal it for fiction.

This was a very enjoyable book. Washington comes across as an ambitious, but not self-serving, man. Not a particularly good general, and sometimes too slow to realize he could no longer trust former friends.

I know very little American history, having forgotten most of what I was supposed to learn in my weird intro course in college and my really bad AP course in high school. So I’m slowly reading books. A while back I listened to a tape of Isaacson’s biography of Benjamin Franklin, which made me want to read a biography of John Adams (in particular, the McCullough one). Next up, however, is Ellis’s Founding Brothers, which I listened to the beginning of in June, and bought (in paper form) a few weeks ago. Also on the list is Chernow’s Alexander Hamilton. From what I’ve read so far, Hamilton makes a great villain.

Comments Off on His Excellency, Joseph J. Ellis (12)

Filed under Books