- Let’s Try It One More Time: A Tale of Three Best-Sellers — some examples of bestselling novels that underwent extensive revision:
What impresses — and consoles me — about these over-the-top tales of revision behind successful writing is the commitment of these writers to push themselves and their willingness to jettison reams of copy in search of an acceptable version.
- Zanzjan on sequels:
The first tricksy thing is finding a balance of clueing in some of the past without making the book FEEL like a sequel….So, for those of you who write stuff that are discrete stories set in a single universe, how do you maintain that balance, or do you assiduously avoid letting works cross-pollinate? As a reader, what strategies of this sort makes you crazy?
Good comments in the, uh, comments.
Category Archives: Writing
Links
Weekly Summaries March 18
Links:
• I’m a fan of saving the environment, but doing without toilet paper is further than I want to go by a long shot.
• What’s the next puzzle craze after sudoku? Article with sample puzzles. The nurikabe was really easy.
• Limyaael’s Non-Villain rant. There’s no reason that you need to assume a villain in order to have a story. Mainstream fiction and many “classic†novels get away quite handily with having no villain, or only one truly despicable character in a populated world where many other shades of morality exist.
Writing Summary:
Goals for the past week:
Two reviews – one on the OWW, one off.
Revise ATfD. Almost done.
Although there’s a large energy barrier to critting, I really enjoy it. I like taking things apart and seeing how they work, and I like the chance of discovering something really good.
I should write more short stories. (I won’t, of course, because I don’t have short ideas.) It’s so nice to be able to go over a whole story in one sitting, and keep it all in my head at once. I need more practice with endings, too, and they’re a lot faster to get to in a 2k word story than a 90k story.
Goals for the coming week:
Revise (and submit) ATfD.
Write post about beginnings of novels.
Tasks for later:
(OWW) Catch up on reviews to be returned. (Only one or two left.)
(Trapped Magic) Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15, Finish ch 1-3, Type ch 4-10, Notebook notes for ch 11-15.
Other stuff:
I’m in the early stages of creating my own WordPress theme. Since I don’t know PHP at all and my CSS is built on a weak foundation, this is slow. But fun.
Weekly Summaries March 11
Warning: This post is all about me — no links this week. Sorry. (Go watch more hockey fights if you're bored.)
Updated my exceedingly boring nonfiction site with some of the FrameMaker stuff I was playing around with recently. I have a bunch of links (to old clips) I need to add to that site someday soon; since my articles are all on other sites, that's tricky, since they could disappear at any time.
Shameless plug: If you click on this link to the html version of the FrameMaker tables article that I sold to AC, they will pay me an additional $0.0015. (So no, I won't notice if you look or not!)
Writing Summary:
Took the week off due to sickness. I did get some reviews done early in the week, at least.
Goals for the coming week:
Two reviews – one on the OWW, one off.
Revise ATfD.
Tasks for whenever:
(OWW) Catch up on reviews to be returned.
(Trapped Magic) Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15, Finish ch 1-3, Type ch 4-10, Notebook notes for ch 11-15.
Filed under Uncategorized, Writing
Weekly Summaries March 4
Misc:
• lavenderbard has started a community for Life Is Too Grim Already, an organization (still being developed) that she came up with to promote the creation and distribution of “not grim” science fiction and fantasy, largely by making it easier for readers to find this kind of book.
I like grim quite a lot, but since it is sometimes nice to read something not-grim, I'll keep an eye on this. I went over my reading list from the past few years and came up with hardly any not-grim books.
• frost-light on whether to tell someone that the book you're critting for them stinks: Honesty is golden when it comes to critiquing. Now, you don't have to be rude and say “this stinks” or “you're the worst writer ever!”, but an explanation of the how, what and why is important. Mentioning what you DID like also is important, because that shows the writer where their strengths are (at least in your opinion).
Absolutely right. If someone's serious about improving, it doesn't do any good to not tell them the problems you see. (Though figuring out whether they're serious or not can be tricky.) But rudeness doesn't actually help get your point across.
• Justine Larbalestier forwards a question about good day jobs for writers.
• Yesterday I discovered hockeyfights.com. Ratings, reviews, and videos. I am both amused and happy that I can see fights from games I don't watch.
Writing Summary:
Goals for the week fortnight (halfway through):
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15, Finish ch 1-3, Type ch 4-10, Notebook notes for ch 11-15.
Not the scenes-that-could-be-a-short mentioned above, darn it. Have successfully resisted.
Unexpected stuff that came up: Revising a short story, and some critting on the OWW.
This week I need do to more critting, which is only partly a blatant attempt to get more reviews. I also have a few reviews to return. And I continue to test the “learn how to write better by critting” thing that so many people have mentioned…
Weekly Summaries Feb. 25
Writing Summary:
I took the week off from writing, mostly, and may take this week off as well. Needed a break, and needed time to do some other things.
Also, my brain thinks it should be in story-producing mode, rather than editing mode or writing mode. Story-producing mode means daydreaming. It seems incredibly non-productive (because I lie around in bed producing nothing tangible), and it steals creative energy from whatever I should be working on, but without it, there would be no stories to write in the future.
Though it'd be nice if my brain weren't stuck on a story that's so far down the to-write queue. Maybe I can make these scenes into a short story. They're more bits of the Joceln-and-Arthos book, and I'm already trying to sell the prologue as a short story. And it could be more emotion-practice….
Should do in the next two weeks:
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15
Finish ch 1-3
Type ch 4-10
Notebook notes for ch 11-15
Not the scenes-that-could-be-a-short mentioned above, darn it.
Monthly Checkup:
My February goals have morphed into March goals. But I made progress on the more important ones, and on various things that came up since I set them, so whatever. I seem to have two big problems with setting medium-term goals: changing my mind partway through, and a lack of motivation since I have no deadlines.
I try to think of them more as guidelines, and as long as I'm being productive on something, to not worry about it much. It'll all even out eventually.
Misc.:
So I'm reading this book that shall remain unnamed. And, argh. It's a sequel to a book that I liked a lot – enough that I picked up books 2 and 3 without any reservations. But oh, the angst! Why is it so much more annoying than in book 1? Possibly because it isn't new? Or is the author really beating me over the head with it that much more in this book? Or is the plot just not as interesting/fast-paced as in book 1, and so doesn't make up for all the whining? Or am I just over sensitive to emotional stuff because that's what I've been working on lately?
(Those would be rhetorcal questions, though you're welcome to answer them anyway.)
There are a lot of little bits that seem very repetitive. I feel like the author tells me everything twice. I was going to put it down at chapter 10, but kept going — there is just enough plot to drag me through the slowness, and the angst seems to be dropping off (after a bit with too little emotional payoff) — and then I hit a bizarre statement about wine transportation that made no sense, and important plot points ought to make more sense.
Sooo…..maybe I'll just move on to the next thing on the to-read shelf. You only get to annoy me so much before I put the book down “temporarily” and neglect to pick it up again. Even if I do want to know what happens, it may not be worth my time.
There are probably lessons here for me as a writer, but I suspect they're not ones I should be learning. I tend to err the other way — not including enough, rather than too much.
Weekly Summaries Feb. 18
Links:
•Links to various free SF sites
Shameless self-promotion:
•How to format a manuscript for an online critique group.
Writing Summary:
Goals for the week:
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15 – maybe half?
Go over the notebook notes for ch 4-10
Go over crits for ch 1-3 – half done, but haven’t started any edits yet.
Do some reviews (have at least 2 to return) – Did 1.
That list appears deceptively short, looking back on it. Spent a lot of time on two notes: “Does this do enough to show why Jessa cares?” and “Does it make the reader care?” Both required planting things all the way back to ch 2. With luck the answer to both is now Yes.
This week:
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15
Finish ch 1-3
Type ch 4-10
Notebook notes for ch 11-15
The notes for 11-15 aren’t so bad; I’ve already dealt with most of them. (Maybe I can get a head start on ch 17, which has a two page essay on “something’s wrong and i don’t know what”….)
Filed under Uncategorized, Writing
Weekly Summaries Feb. 12
Links:
• (Humor) Helpful advice in the event of terrorist attacks. I like the one with the blaring radio.
• Via anghara, daily diversions for writers (comics)
• How to Move Posts from LiveJournal to WordPress is my first article for Associated Content. (Paid more than the cup of coffee I’d expected.) I really should finish backing up my old LJ posts someday.
Writing Summary:
Last week’s goal:
Revise more: through ch 10 (except for dealing with the scene that might need cut).
What I did:
• Dealt with the scene that needed cut. Had to move four bits of description elsewhere — I tend towards sparseness so can’t afford to lose any. Two bits went to a scene where I’d cut some boring bits, and the other two went to a scene that had previously been set in a place I’d been setting far too many scenes. Hopefully it is now more interesting.
• Unstickynoted [1] ch 4-10
• Dealt with some notebook notes for ch 4-10
• Started unstickynoting ch 11-15
[1] unstickynote – Look at each page of the manuscript and make all corrections marked with sticky notes. Generally these are smaller (or at least scene-specific) things. Larger concerns are scribbled in a notebook.
This week:
Finish unstickynoting ch 11-15
Go over the notebook notes for ch 4-10
Go over crits for ch 1-3
Do some reviews (have at least 2 to return)
Unstickynoting is easier than dealing with the notebook notes, which is why I put those off last week.
I’m not going to finish this before March like I wanted, probably, but I’ll see how close I can get.
On the one hand I feel like I’m wasting my time (first novel, why bother fixing it again, better to write a new one). On the other hand, I think I’m getting a good return on my time as far as quality goes.
Filed under Uncategorized, Writing
Weekly Summaries Feb 5
Links:
• Tobias Buckell tells how he got his freelance career started.
• Dvorak update: I know all my letters and lots of punctuation. Friday afternoon I made the switch entirely. I type verrrry slowly now; it’s annoying, but I had to switch bc my fingers were getting confused. And it’d be good to stop hitting ctrl-q when I mean ctrl-x. At least OpenOffice asks me to confirm that I want to quit.
Goals for the week:
Revise a lot.
Try to get Chs 1-3 ready for critique.
Do two critiques.
Writing Summary:
I’ve been revising. Not much interesting to say. Chapters 1-3 are up for review on the OWW. I’ve also handled random sticky notes throughout the book.
This week:
Revise more: through ch 10 (except for dealing with the scene that might need cut). That’ll give me a week to do the next 10 chapters and a few days for other stuff (like crits)
Filed under Uncategorized, Writing
Weekly Summary, Jan 28
x-post from LJ
Misc:
• Jenny Rappaport has some interesting things to say about query letters.
In the comments, someone asked her about mentioning higher education degrees. That’s something I’ve never even thought about including. If it’s not strictly relevant, I don’t see why anyone would care. “I became interested in writing about research students at a university while pursuing graduate study in physics.” Just not relevant.
Now, if I wrote science fiction rather than fantasy, or fantasy about materials science, that’d be different. Or if I wrote books set in modern times, I could pull up the other degree/career. (Someday I’m going to write a murder mystery involving the perils of installing sidewalks in a subdivision that doesn’t want them.)
Do you guys include your education or career experience? Is it relevant?
• Dvorak update: I know almost all my letters (the top two rows – I still can’t type my name) and some punctuation. Though I’m not too fond of having the ‘ and ” key where the qwerty’s q is. We’ll see.
Writing Summary:
I’ve decided to reduce the number of soldiers that show up at Jessa’s inn in Chapter 1. While reading through to check all the times I referred to their number, I found these lines:
Page 15: “There must have been at least fifteen of them.”
Page 17: “Seventeen against three. I like those odds.”
Page 20: “…killed twenty men.”
Good thing they didn’t run into those guys on page 354; my characters wouldn’t have stood a chance against so many men.
I’ve dug through chapters 1-3 to see where I can tighten things up a bit. Chapter 2 has the most potential for shrinkage. That’ll be tomorrow’s task, though; for now I’m declaring myself done for the night and am going to go read.
Comments Off on Weekly Summary, Jan 28
Filed under Writing
Conflict Box
This isn't the book I meant to work on today.
I decided to catch up on the He Wrote, She Wrote writing workshop blog, and Jenny Crusie's post on the Conflict Box struck me as useful. Diplomacy is at a point where I need to take a look at the plot and make sure the conflicts are solid and all the characters are working towards their goals and butting heads.
So I made a Conflict Box, or at least a modified version thereof. Instead of one protagonist and one antagonist, I have two of each. And rather than listing only Goal and Conflict for each character, I listed Goal, Means, and Obstacle. (Which could be rephrased as Desire, Goal, Conflict, I guess.)
Warning: For the at least one person reading this who avoids spoilers, even for unfinished unpublished books you're never going to read, there are spoilers in my diagram.
(Click on it once to enlarge it, and click again to enlarge it again.)
(Yes, it would have been faster to do by hand, but it's easier to edit this way.)
So is it useful? Maybe. Having character goals, and how they plan to achieve their goals, is very useful. But I had those already. I had the obstacles already too, but drawing this did help me consider whether they're useful obstacles. Also, as I begin the rewrite, it gives me something to focus on. In the first draft, Conway doesn't really appear until somewhere in the middle, because I didn't know what the plot was. He ends up kind of important, so I shouldn't ignore him…
I do want to add a Resolution column, because it would be good to know that all the conflicts are resolved. Especially since the details of how is the part I'm stuck on right now. 🙂
Comments Off on Conflict Box
Filed under Writing