Category Archives: Writing

A Feast For Crows; Synopses Links

Finished A Feast for Crows. Loved it, though I’m not champing at the bit for the next one just yet. I need a break to read something completely different. I’m trying to read a book a month this year (those of you doing the 52-book challenge are welcome to laugh). I didn’t think this was the first book I read this month, but I don’t have any other posts tagged. And apparently I never tagged a post for Tamara Siler Jones’ Ghosts in the Snow, but I must have read it last fall. (It was good, go read it.)

I skimmed through Way of the Cheetah and found it less than useful. I’ll take another look before I delete it/give it away.

Paperback Writer lists synopsis-writing links.

Comments Off on A Feast For Crows; Synopses Links

Filed under Books, Writing

Synopses

As part of the current blogversation on synopses, Justine Larbalestier writes on her experience with synopses and why it’s easier to do them before you write the book (my emphasis).

This is the part where I die laughing. Not a planner, me.
I guess I wrote a synopsis of the theater book before I wrote it: it was 50,000 words and took a month, and the book isn’t following it very closely.

Comments Off on Synopses

Filed under Writing

New Year's Goals – 2006

It’s about that time of year again.

Results for 2005:
* Stick with the daily writing schedule (7 hours/week) – Did well enough at this, and surpassed it, for much of the year. Lately things have been backsliding.

* Finish the third draft of Lost Magic (by June) and send the whole thing to beta readers. – Yep. And submitted it, which goal had been set five years ago.

* Research, outline, and otherwise plan the rewrite of the zeroth draft of the theater book, and then start rewriting it from scratch. – Yep. (Granted, it’s pretty easy to meet a goal that says “start”. Maybe I should set more of those.)

* Do the characterization and description exercises, and critique regularly – No. In fact, I don’t remember what description exercises I’m referring to. I did well at critting for the first half of the year, but once my own book was done, I stopped.

For 2006:
* Keep sending Lost Magic to agents. One response is still pending, and I need to make a list of more agents to submit to. It’d be more efficient to send to more than two at a time. Probably need to revise my synopsis as well.

* Completely finish the theater book. This is an ambitious goal for me, especially given the slow pace of the past couple months. But I’m not spending five years on a book again.

* Spend more time on writing – that has to happen if I’m going to make the previous goal.

* Do the emotion exercises I said I’d do last year, and do two crits/month minimum. (Or enough to submit things for critique.)

Comments Off on New Year's Goals – 2006

Filed under Life, Writing

Pre-published?

Arcaedia asks about the difference between the terms “pre-published” and “unpublished”. Pre-published, to me, sounds like someone is trying too hard to distance themselves from the unpublished masses.

In the comments, some people say they dislike “aspiring”, which is the term I usually use. Not sure why I use it. I suppose it’s my occasional habit of being overly correct, even though in the phrase “unpublished fantasy novelist”, it’s clear enough that “unpublished” applies only to fantasy novels.

Comments Off on Pre-published?

Filed under Writing

Writer Sins & Pork and Plums

Merrie Haskell made a delightful list of writer sins. I need to get my magnets repolarized so I stick to my chair better.

Food: Cinnamon-spiced Pork and Prunes Plums
Once again from Cooking Light. This was *amazingly* good. Very simple – the flavorings are cinnamon, cloves, and wine – and it smells like a holiday while it’s cooking, which is not for long.

Comments Off on Writer Sins & Pork and Plums

Filed under Food, Writing

Link: Learning to Write

Sartorias on on learning to write etc

Comments Off on Link: Learning to Write

Filed under Writing

Link: Becoming a Mid-List Writer

Matociquala posted on How to become a mid-list writer. It’s a good post, even for those of us who don’t need to be worred about that stage of career yet. Thought the advice to keep writing while finished books are in submission is good for anyone.

Comments Off on Link: Becoming a Mid-List Writer

Filed under Writing

Ready or not

Over on rec.arts.sf.composition, a poster wondered whether his book is ready to publish. Patricia C. Wrede wrote:

So: What you *want* is somebody to tell you whether or not this thing you have written is publishable. What you *need* is a way of deciding for yourself whether it is time to send it out. This is how I have done it, right from the beginning: and she lists a series of questions for deciding whether something is ready or not

The four questions involve thinking about a) whether you can actually solve the problems with the book, b) how long solving the problems would take, and c) whether solving the problems would make the book better.

This is a way of thinking about editing that I found very helpful, because I know my current book has problems, but I don’t know how to fix all of them yet. Some things (emotions) will take me a lot of practice – probably a whole nother book – to learn how to do better. I could spend the time and fix this book, but it probably would take too long, and that time would be better spent rewriting the next book.

So I’ve divided up the fixes into mental categories:
1. Stuff I can safely leave un-fixed, because it’s minor and I’m not quite sure what to do about it anyway, like the occasional odd word choice.
2. Stuff that needs to be fixed and I know how to do it – that ranges from typos to the Trust Issue.
3. Stuff that I don’t know what to do about yet – a lot of that is aspects of the overall big picture. Voice, setting.

Category 2 is the biggest. Yay. Category 1 will get ignored. Category 3, well, I can practice on the next book. And then come back and fix this one again later, assuming I’ll get that chance because no one will buy it as is. And if they do buy it, then it didn’t need fixed after all.

The idea of sending something out that has problems that I can identify still gives me the creeps, though.

Comments Off on Ready or not

Filed under Writing

Writing Links

has an excellent post on conscious incompetence and the perceived suckiness of writing and plateaus et al.

Comments Off on Writing Links

Filed under Writing

What newly-published authors…

What newly-published authors find out and you want to know
Wiscon Panel #42
Saturday, 10 a.m.

Panelists: John M. Scalzi [an excellent moderator], Barth Anderson, Kelly D. Link, Virginia “Ginny” G. McMorrow

[Relatively short report – I only took only two pages of notes.]

Publicity / Blogging:

One of the topics discussed was the importance of blogging and having an internet presence as a form of networking and publicity. Somehow I think that has worked better for John Scalzi than for most of the rest of us.

[But then I do this for fun and to learn about writing, and networking done for fun is probably a better kind of networking.]

One of the best forms of publicity is keeping a blog, Link said.
Scalzi added that getting your book mentioned on blogs with a large audience helps.
Anderson said the internet is great for networking. He has a blog, but said that if he has to make a choice between blogging and writing, he usually writes. [Good plan.]

Someone, I missed who, said it’s important to comment intelligently on other people’s blogs. Then, other bloggers and blog-readers will follow your link back to your own blog and/or website. That’s how commenting creates publicity for you.

Other Publicity:

Scalzi sold his books after putting them on his website, which leads to a debate on whether giving away your writing helps.

Scalzi said it’s hard to do publicity in the traditional sense, because there are so many new authors, so each gets lost in the shuffle.

Business:

One possible frustration is that new authors will get no say in things like their cover art. Scalzi says there’s a certain publisher he refuses to sell to, because their covers are embarrassing. [He wouldn’t name it. Feel free to guess.]

On agents: Lots of places don’t take unagented work; the agents handle the paperwork so writers can write; and there are a lot of bad agents out there, so do your research.

And keep writing while stuff’s in submission, of course.

Comments Off on What newly-published authors…

Filed under Writing